God Hooey Bang Theory

olber
BANG!
and then the universe warped and heaved
and stretched and weaved
like nothing that has EVER been seen,
and like nothing that may ever be seen agin.
Okay. This can't be as satisfying as the molecular evolution page because I am not an astrophysicist,
I'm a FREEKIN' computational molecular biologist.
Nonetheless, it doesn't take more than a basic understanding of the scientific method
to understand that the big bang theory is a house of cards..
woe be the fact of all of this theistic pollution having damaged our precious body of knowledge.
Personally, I am highly skeptical of the red shift idea. How is this reconciled with perturbations due to magnetic fields?
Oh well.. my MAIN beef is with Olber's paradox.
I have a Yale physicist Ph.D. candidate backing me up on this one now..
we need 3-D polar coodinates here and extinction coefficients for luminosity and the unknown total denisty beyond the event horizon.
What of stars so far that they may send us single photons every million years?
certainly they are part of the navy blue backdrop undetected by the state of the art.
It's just common sense.
Just because the universe APPEARS to be expanding from our point of view during our tiny thousand year window of observance,
doesn't mean that it has been expanding for a thousand TIMES this long.
Furthermore, we not only have the absurd temporal extrapolation problem,
I take issue with spacial triangulations with heavy biases in the z axis.
This is an engineering issue. 2+2=5 for especially large values of 2, remember?

the

forest????

As, if it is SPARSE enough, it is NOT a forest.. but a MEADOW!!!!!!!
dummkopf | in labour | skepticism | right on | other stuf | edgar
cosmology | dark sky | ho hum | dome

okay.. ::grunt:: now this just strikes me as a little open to interpretation, that's all. here's NASA's side of the story {:p